nous: indemonstrable knowledge and aristotle's epistemic hexis

نویسندگان

مهدی قوام صفری

دانشیار گروه فلسفه دانشکدة ادبیات دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

in the last chapter of his posterior analytics, aristotle raises two questions about the archai of knowledge (epistêmê) that are to be answered by nous, the key concept which must be illustrated itself before getting the answers. while in both of these answers, as in some other passages, nous is introduced as the hexis of the soul, it is the second answer where nous is considered as one of the stages and degrees of knowledge. having discussed aristotle's second question and its answers in the first part of this paper, we are going to recognize, in the second part, three substantial senses of hexis. based on these senses, the third part aims to challenge some commentators' view of dunamis as the only sense of hexis throughout posterior analytics. the first part of article ends with the explanation of this problem. the second part of article will examine what is nous.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

nous: indemonstrable knowledge and aristotle's epistemic hexis (ii)

corresponding to the division of the scientific knowledge to demonstrable and indemonstrable knowledge in aristotle’s philosophy, the concept of nous has two interwoven senses. besides nous as the demonstrable scientific knowledge, it is also regarded as the hexis of the soul. there are three specific functions of this latter sense: i) acquiring principles on which the scientific knowledge is b...

متن کامل

Epistemic Issues and Group Knowledge

Formal models for group knowledge can help philosophers gain additional insight into the ramifications of the philosophical concepts that they propose by clarifying the abstract properties of these concepts and their relationship to alternative proposals. To date, however, formal treatments of group knowledge have remained largely disjointed from the related philosophical discussions and are th...

متن کامل

Group Knowledge and Epistemic Defeat

If individual knowledge and justification can be vanquished by epistemic defeaters, then the same should go for group knowledge. Lackey (2014) has recently argued that one especially strong conception of group knowledge defended by Bird (2010) is incapable of explaining how it is that (group) knowledge is ever subject to ordinary mechanisms of epistemic defeat. Lackey takes it that her objectio...

متن کامل

Epistemic Logic and Knowledge Management

In most textbooks on knowledge management (KM; e.g., [5]), there is no reference to epistemic concepts at all. In [8], there is even an explicit statement that epistemologic concepts of knowledge are “useless“ for KM, since KM seems to be about the use rather than the truth aspect of knowledge. However, there is a remarkably explicit reference to such concepts in [7] establishing the use of epi...

متن کامل

Proper Epistemic Knowledge Bases

Reasoning about the nested beliefs or knowledge of other agents is essential for many collaborative and competitive tasks. However, reasoning with nested belief (for example through epistemic logics) is computationally expensive. Proper Epistemic Knowledge Bases (PEKBs) address this by enforcing syntactic restrictions on the knowledge base. By compiling a PEKB and query formula into a specific ...

متن کامل

Epistemic Alc-knowledge Bases

Statement of interest We consider the epistemic concept language proposed in 5], which has been used to formalize procedural rules and weak deenitions using a very restricted form of epis-temic sentences. Our statement is that there are a number of other uses of the epistemic operator that require diierent forms of epistemic sentences in the knowledge base. To justify this statement we brieey r...

متن کامل

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023